Avinash Dagdu Jagdale v. The State Of Maharashtra

Shubhada S Kadam 36-aba-285-2021.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 285 OF 2021 Avinash Dagdu Jagdale ... Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr.Prashant Raul along with Mr. Mayur G. Sanap, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Kiran C. Shinde, APP for the State/Respondent. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 19th MARCH, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

Learned APP, on instructions, submitted that charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, hence, application can be disposed of. 3.

Considering the submission of learned APP as well as charge-sheet has been filed against the applicant, the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not required. The application is disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2024.03.20 15:04:55 +0530 1/1 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM