Raju Laxman Karale v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba.235.17.911.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 235 OF 2017 Raju Laxman Karale ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Satyavrat Joshi for the Applicant Mr. Deepak Thakare, A.P.P for the Respondent-State PSI Mr. Mhaske from Narayangaon Police Station, Pune is present CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

TUESDAY, 4 th APRIL, 2017 P.C. :

1.

Learned A.P.P on instructions, states that the police intends to file a supplementary charge-sheet, essentially with regard to the proof of age of the prosecutrix within one week from today. The said statement is accepted. 2.

In view of the statement made by the learned A.P.P, learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial Court after filing of the chargesheet. 3.

Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

SQ Pathan 1/2

ba.235.17.911.doc 4.

It is made clear that if an application is preferred by the applicant before the trial Court after filing of the supplementary charge-sheet, the learned Judge shall consider the same on its own merits, on the basis of the material in the supplementary charge-sheet, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this application.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2