← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1295/2014disposed off

Shri. Mandlik Ramrao Bhausaheb v. State Of Maharashtra, Through Secretary, School Education Dept And ORS

2019-11-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari4 pages

Sharayu Khot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3305 OF 2014 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1719 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 3305 OF 2014 Shri Digamber Pandurang Karche WRIT PETITION NO. 612 OF 2010 REVIEW PETITION NO. 64 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 612 OF 2010 Shri Pramod Vishnu Sutar WRIT PETITION NO. 613 OF 2010 REVIEW PETITION NO. 66 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 613 OF 2010 1 / 4

Shri. Kishor Shivaji Kamble WRIT PETITION NO. 10126 OF 2013 Shri Shahajahan Mahamd Hanif Patil & Anr.

...Petitioners

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

WRIT PETITION NO. 12 OF 2014 Shri Gaikwad Dattatraya Ganpat WRIT PETITION NO. 1291 OF 2014 Shri Kadam Bhaskar Bhimdeo WRIT PETITION NO. 1294 OF 2014 Shri Kharade Rajendra Ajinath 2 / 4

WRIT PETITION NO. 1295 OF 2014 Shri Mandlik Ramrao Bhausaheb WRIT PETITION NO. 1815 OF 2014 Shri. Vijay Raygonda Lohar WRIT PETITION NO. 1816 OF 2014 Shri. Popat Ananda Mane ---------- Mr. Saurabh Pakale, a/w Dnyaneshar Kale, i/by Kiran Kumar Phakade, for the Petitioners in WPs/612/10, 613/10, 1815/14, 1816/14 and 7985/09 is not on board.

Mr. V.A. Madane, for the Petitioner in WPs/12/14, 1291/14, 1294/14, 1295/14.

Mr. Y.B. Lengare, for the Petitioners in WP/10126/13. Mrs. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP, for the Respondent-State in all WPs. Mr. Ranjeet H. Patil, Mr. Kiran Patil, i/by for the Respondents No. 5 & 6 in WP/613/10.

Mr. Milind Deshmukh, for the Respondent No. 5 in Wps/1294/14 and 1295/14.

3 / 4

Mr. M.N. Dhamal, for the Respondents No. 6 to 8 in WP/3305/14. Mr. Chandrashekhar Dhekane, Asstt. Director Pune present in Court. ---------- CORAM : S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA JJ.

DATE : 07 November 2019 ORDER :

1.

These Petitioners have since been absorbed and their services are protected. In these circumstances, by virtue of the subsequent development, these Writ Petitions are rendered infructuous. These are disposed of as infructuous. 2.

All the interim applications will not survive once the Writ Petitions are disposed of.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.] [S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.] 4 / 4