← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2088/2008disposed off

Dr. Rakeshkumar Trivedy v. The Registrar - Pune University And ORS.

2016-09-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar2 pages

45-CAW-457.2014.sxw hvn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2088 OF 2008 ALONG WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 457 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2088 OF 2008 Dr. Rakeshkumar Trivedi ...

Petitioner

Versus

The Registrar, Pune University and Ors. ... Respondents Ms.Kumud Bhatia for the petitioner.

Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for respondent nos. 5 to 7. Mr. Rajendra Anabhule for respondent nos. 1 and 2. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & MAKARAND KARNIK, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 06, 2016.

P.C.

1.

This court while admitting the petition on 31.3.2008 directed respondent nos. 5 and 6 to process the case papers of the petitioner. It has been stated by the leaned counsel for the University that the petitioner's papers have been processed and the matter has been sent to the Joint Director, respondent no. 5 vide communication dated 11.10.2014 Annex. J recommending the petitioner's claim in terms of the said communication.

45-CAW-457.2014.sxw 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said clarification/recommendation made by the University on 11.10.2014 has to be further processed by respondent no.5 and appropriate decision on it is required to be taken but till date, even after about two years, respondent no. 5 has not taken any decision. 3.

Having considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are inclined to dispose of this petition by directing respondent no.5 to consider the petitioner's case papers as directed by this Court while admitting the petition after taking into consideration the recommendations/clarification received from the University vide letter dated 11.10.2014 Annex. J. Let the decision as aforesaid be taken by respondent no. 5 as expeditiously as possible but not latter than three moths from the date of receipt of copy of this order. If the petitioner is found entitled for the reliefs claimed, the consequential monetary benefits be also extended within the said period.

With the aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. In view of the above, Civil Application also stands disposed of. (MAKARAND KARNIK, J.) (SHANTANU KEMKAR, J.)