Sunny Arun Bagav v. The State Of Maharashtra

: 1 :

12-ba-390-20.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 390 OF 2020 Sunny Arun Bagav .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent _____ None present for Applicant.

Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for State/Respondent. _____ CORAM :SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE :31st JULY, 2021 (Through Video Conferencing) P.C. :

1.

Sufficient notice was given to the advocates about listing of these matters. They were also given an option to intimate the court if the advocate had any personal difficulty. 2.

No such intimation is given. The board was notified well in advance. Nobody appears for the applicant. 3.

The application is, therefore, dismissed for non prosecution.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) by VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date:

2021.08.02 13:29:42 +0530 Gokhale VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE