Sudnyani Panchappa Lingade v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

19. cri wp 399-17.doc RMA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 399 OF 2017 Sudnyani Panchappa Lingade ..

Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..

Respondents ...................

Appearances Mr. D.G. Khamkar Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. H.J. Dedhia APP for the State ...................

CORAM : SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE : JULY 12, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.] : 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

The prayer of the petitioner in this petition is that her case for premature release be decided expeditiously by the State Government.

3.

Learned APP states that the case of the petitioner for categorization for premature release has been decided by jfoanz vkacsjdj 1 of 2

19. cri wp 399-17.doc the Government by order dated 10.7.2017 and the petitioner has been placed in Category 2(b) of 2010 Guidelines. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this petition. The petition is dismissed. Rule is discharged.

[ SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J. ] [ SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. ] jfoanz vkacsjdj 2 of 2