Pandit Alias Pandurang And Another v. Bhajandas Ambrushi Kharat And Another

sa 389 of 2015 (5).sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.389 OF 2015 Pandit @ Pandurang Ambrushi Kharat and Anr.

...

Appellants versus Bhajandas Ambrushi Kharat and Ors.

...

Respondents Mr. V.S.

Talkute, for Appellants.

Mr. Prasad Kulkarni, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3. Mr. S.R.Ghanvat, for Applicant in CA No.1145 of 2017. Mr. Swapnil Patil, for Applicant in CASST No.27721 of 2017. CORAM: S.J. KATHAWALLA, J.

DATE: 28th SEPTEMBER, 2017 P.C.:

1.

The learned Advocate for the parties have tendered Consent Terms. They submit that the Consent be taken on record and the above Second Appeal be decreed in terms of the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The Consent Terms are signed by the parties and their Advocates. In clause No. (P) of the Consent Terms, it is mentioned that the Consent Terms are read over in Marathi and explained to them by the learned Advocates. All the signatories are present in Court. They have informed the Court that they have been explained the contents of the Consent Terms in Marathi and they have understood the same. The undertakings recorded in the Consent Terms are accepted. The above Second Appeal is decreed in terms of the Consent Terms, marked 'X'

.

ssp 1/2

sa 389 of 2015 (5).sxw All concerned to act on an ordinary copy of this order duly authenticated by the Private Secretary of this Court. ( S.J.KATHAWALLA, J. ) ssp 2/2