Meenakshi Shukla v. State Of Maharashtra

by PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK Date:

2022.10.07 14:45:29 +0530 PRAJAKTA SAGAR VARTAK 2.aba 2914-21 IA 364-22.doc Prajakta Vartak

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2914 OF 2021 Mr. Rohit Bhaskar Dubey .. Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra.

.. Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 364 OF 2022 Meenakshi Shukla .. Intervenor In the matter between Rohit Bhaskar Dubey .. Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra.

.. Respondent Mr. Dhrutiman S. Joshi & Sadhava Yadav for the applicant. Ms. Sartaj Shaikh for the respondent no.2.

Smt. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

API Smt. Nayana Patil Wadala Police Station.

CORAM : BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATE : OCTOBER 06, 2022.

P.C.:

1.

Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has married the victim girl and they are residing together. This statement is not disputed by the learned APP.

2.

In the wake of the above statement, the order dated 07 December, 2021 is made absolute.

In the wake of the disposal of the anticipatory bail application, Interim Application No. 364 of 2022 also stands disposed of. (SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.)