Balkrushna K. Bhondave ( Deceased) L/R Shivhaji B. Bhondave (Deceased)L/R Smbhaji S. Bhondaveanda v. Kastur Kesu Bhondave (Since Decesed) L/R Bababi Kastur Bhondave And ORS

1/3 34.WP.3108.2019.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3108 OF 2019 Balkrushna Kesu Bhondave (since deceased) Heir of the deceased

1. Shivhaji Balkrushna Bhondave(since deceased) Heir of the deceased 1(a) Sambhaji Shivaji Bhondave & Ors.

... Petitioners Vs.

1. Kastur Kesu Bhondave (since deceased) Heir of the deceased 1A. Bababai Kastur Bhondave & Ors.

... Respondents ...........

Mr. Mankirat Singh Chhabra for the Petitioners. Mr. Digvijay Patil i/b. Mr. Nitesh Bhutekar for the Respondent No.10. ..........

CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2021.

P. C. :- 1.

Heard Mr. Chhabra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and Mr. Digvijay Patil, learned counsel appearing for the Respondent No.10.

2.

The Petitioners are original Plaintiffs. By the impugned order dated 14th December, 2018, the learned Trial Court has held that Plaintiffs have valued the suit as per Section 6 (iv) (j) of the Bombay Court Fees Act instead of Section 6 (iv) (d) of the Bombay Court Fees Act and further directed to correct the valuation. Accordingly, the Plaintiff has filed application bearing Exhibit-64 in Special Civil

2/3 34.WP.3108.2019.doc Suit No. 1474 of 2018 under order VI Rule 17 of CPC seeking amendment. The said amendment application was allowed by order dated 13th January, 2020 passed by learned 16th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Accordingly the plaint was amended by inserting paragraph number on page 2 of the plaint and by amending paragraph 49 of the plaint. The said amendment is set out hereinbelow for ready reference:- "ए) पसतुतदावयामधीलपानक.

२वरखालूनदुसरीओळ'

दावयाचीआकारणी र.१६,५०,०२,०००/-'

ऐवजीदावयाचीआकारणीर. ६०,९२,९७,०००/-'

असेवाचणयातयावेवतयानुसारदुरसतीकरणयासपरवानगीममळावी. बी) पसतुतवादीयांनीदाखलकेलेलयादावयामधीलपररचछेदक.

४९मधये '

पसतुतदावयाचीआकारणीहीदावाठरावासाठीअसलयानेरकमर. १०००/- वरकरन, तयावरर. २००/- इतकाकोरफीमदलाआहे,'

ऐवजी"पसतुत दावयाचीआकारणीहीदावाठरावासाठीअसलयानेमदबॉमबेकोरफीकायदा कलम (iv)( डी ) नुसार करन , दावा ममळकतीचे रेडीरेकनर / बाजारमुलयानुसारहोणारीककमतर .

, , , /- ( अकरीरपये चौवेचाळीसकोरीबेचाळीसलाखशहानवहजारफक ) ( गरक .

/ १पैकी केत१हे .

२९आरमहणजेच१२९००चौ .

मी .

गुणीलेखुलयाजमीनीचापचललत दरर .

, /- = र .

, , , ०००आणणगरक .

/ २पैकीकेत ०१हे .

६७आरमहणजेच१६७००चौ .

मी .

गुणीलेखुलयाजमीनीचापचललत दरर .

, /- = र .

, , , /- यानुसारदोनहीदावा ममळकतीचीएकुणककमतर .

, , , /-) वरपसतुतदावयाची आकारणीकरन , तयावरदेयअँडवहोलाराममुदांकर .

३ , , /- पैकीमद बॉमबेकोरफीकायदाकलम६ (iv)( डी ) नुसार१ / ४महणजेचर .

, / इतकाकोरफीदेयआहे."

अशीदुरसतीकरणेसपसतुतवादीयांनापरवानगी ममळणेआवशयकझालेआहे.

सी) पसतुतवादीयांनीदाखलकेलेलयादावयामधीलपररचछेदक.

४९मधये "

एकुणआकारणीरकमर. १६,५०,०२,०००/-"

ऐवजी"

एकुणआकारणी रकमर. ६०,९२,९७,०००/-'

'

असेवाचणयातयावेवतशीदुरसतीकरणयास परवानगीममळावी."

3.

Mr. Chhabra, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners states that in view of the said subsequent development of amending the plaint, the petition has become infructuous. However, he states

3/3 34.WP.3108.2019.doc that liberty be given to challenge the impugned order dated 14th December, 2018 in Appeal, if the occasion arises. 4.

The Writ Petition is disposed of as infructuous subject to the liberty as prayed.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)