Shri Jagdishprasad Girirajprasad Agrawal (Applicant/Org. Resp. 1) And ANR v. Shri Taraknath Banku Baital (Orig. Petitioner)

KJ 1/1 CAC109.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.109 OF 2015 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.709 OF 2014 Shri Jagdishprasad Girirajprasad Agarwal ) and Anr.

)... Applicants V/s.

Shri Taraknath Banku Baital )... Respondent ---- Mr.A.J.Kenjale for applicants.

Mr.Ganesh S.Bhat for respondent.

---- CORAM: K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATED : 17.2.2015.

P.C. :

Mr.Bhat counsel for the respondent states that his client has no objection for carrying out the repairs as requested by the applicant/landlord. Mr.Bhat also states that in view of the work schedule of his client it would be better if the Advocate for the applicant inform him atleast 3 days in advance of the time when his client would be visiting the suit premises for carrying out necessary repairs. At this stage, the counsel for the applicant states that he would carry out the repairs on 20.2.2015 and the applicants' representatives will visit the suit premises at 10.00 A.M. Civil Application accordingly, disposed.

(K.R.SHRIRAM, J.)