← Library
Bombay High CourtFCA/161/2014disposed off

Mrs. Nikita Sagar Tale v. Mr. Sagar Ramesh Tale

2017-09-01Hon'Ble Smt. Justice V.K. Tahilramani,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi2 pages

jdk 1 2.fca.161.14.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION F.C.A. NO. 161 OF 2014 Mrs. Nikita Sagar Tale (Dalvi) .. Appellant Vs.

Mr. Sagar Ramesh Tale .. Respondent ....

Mr. Nikhilesh Pote i/b Asim Sarode and Associates Advocate for Appellant Mr. Mihir Raje Advocate for Respondent ....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 01, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.]: Heard the learned counsel for the appellant - wife and the learned counsel for the respondent - husband as well as the appellant and respondent who are present before the Court. The appellant - wife has preferred this Family Court Appeal against the order of the Family Court whereby husband's petition for restitution of conjugal rights was granted and counter claim of the wife for divorce on the ground of cruelty was dismissed.

jdk 2 2.fca.161.14.doc The learned counsel for both sides state that the matter is amicably settled between the parties and the parties have prepared consent terms. They have tendered the consent terms which are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

The appellant and the respondent who are present in person before the Court state that they have read the consent terms and have knowingly and voluntarily signed the consent terms. Pursuant to the consent terms, the counter claim of the wife for divorce on the ground of cruelty is converted into a petition for divorce by mutual consent and the marriage between the parties is dissolved by mutual consent. Undertakings given by both the parties in the consent terms are accepted.

This Family Court Appeal is disposed of in view of the consent terms. Decree be drawn up accordingly. [DR.SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI,J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J. ] kandarkar