← Library
Bombay High CourtREVN/42/2019others disposed off

Pratap Arjun Nagwekar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2019-10-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari2 pages

43-REVN-42-2019 & ors.doc Tandle

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2019 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 57 OF 2019 Pratap Arjun Nagvekar ... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 353 OF 2019 Ratilal Pitambar Bhole ... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 465 OF 2013 WITH CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 466 OF 2013 Umesh Manohar Chamankar ... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent . . . . . .

Mr. H. E. Palwe i/b Mr. A. B. Desai for Applicant in REVN/57/2019 & REVN/42/2019.

Ms. Archana Shelar i/b Vishakha Pandit for Applicant in REVN/353/2019. Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b Vikram Sutaria for Applicant in REVN/465/2013 and REVN/466/2013.

Mr. R. M. Pethe, APP for Respondent-State.

. . . . . .

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2019 P. C. :

1/2

43-REVN-42-2019 & ors.doc 1.

In view of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the Case of Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. Ramesh Gelli and others reported in (2016) 3 SCC 788, the learned counsel for the respective applicants seek leave to withdraw the applications. Leave granted.

2.

Criminal Revision Applications are dismissed as withdrawn. (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 2/2