Pankaj Sanghani v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

V.A. Tikam 25- WP 764 of 2020.doc VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2023.12.05 11:29:07 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 764 OF 2020 Pankaj Sanghani .. Petitioner vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents Mr. Avdhoot Prabhu a/w. Ms. Divya D. Dane i/b. Lex Services, for the Petitioner Mr. Ajay Patil, APP for the State- Respondent No.1 Mr. Vikramsingh Parmar (through V.C.) CORAM: A. S. GADKARI AND SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.

DATE : 28th NOVEMBER, 2023.

P. C.:- 1) Learned Advocate for Petitioner on instructions submitted that, the directions issued vide Order dated 19th March, 2020 are complied with. 2) Learned Advocate for Respondent No.2 submitted that Respondent No.2 has already filed his Affidavit dated 5th February, 2020 duly affirmed by the Notary Public, on record. The Order dated 11th March 2020 records the said fact.

4) In view of the fact that the parties herein have settled the matter amicably and in furtherance of Orders dated 11th March, 2020 and 19th March, 2020, they have complied with the necessary directions. 5) Petition accordingly is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). (SHYAM C. CHANDAK,J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1