Priti Bunty Chugh v. The State Of Maharashtra

Vina k sr.901.appp..83.2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 83 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 86 OF 2017 Smt. Priti Bunty Chugh ...Applicant/ Intervener.

In the matter of Shri Shankarlal Meghrajmal Chugh & ors.

... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

---------- Mr. S. K. Gawada for the intervener.

Mr. Mohamed V. Kazi for the applicant in Apl/86/17. Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the respondent - State. ---------- CORAM :

PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE :

18th AUGUST, 2017.

P.C. :

1.

The applicant is the first informant. The complaint was lodged against the husband and the other in-laws of applicant. In view of this the intervener's application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

2.

The applicant in Criminal Application No.86 of 2017 is directed to implead the first informant as respondent no.2. The copy of the application may be served upon the counsel for respondent no.2. 1/2

Vina k sr.901.appp..83.2017.doc Application No. 86 of 2017 is stand over to 28th August, 2017. 2.

Application stands disposed of.

[PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.] 2/2