← Library
Bombay High CourtFERA/38/2009dissmiss for defaultnonprosecution

Ghanshyam Kasat v. Union Of India

2017-09-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka1 pages

4-FERA-38-2009.DOC Jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FERA APPEAL NO. 38 OF 2009 IN APPEAL NO. 294 OF 1999 Ghanshyam Kasat ...Appellant

Versus

Union of India, Through Special Director, Enforcement Directorate, Mumbai

...Respondents

None for the Appellant.

Mrs. S.V. Bharucha for the Respondents.

CORAM:

A.S. OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED:

8th September 2017 PC:- 1.

Court service notice was issued to the Appellant which is returned unserved with the remark that the Appellant has left the premises about 11 years back.

2.

The Court service notice was issued at the registered address mentioned in the Appeal. The Appellant has failed to inform his correct address to the Court Registry. 3.

Hence, we dismiss the Appeal for non-prosecution. ( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) ( A.S. OKA, J ) 1/1