Salim Mohd. Ansari v. Sayyadali Abdulijaffar Choudhary And ORS.

31.wp477.19.doc .IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

1. CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 477 OF 2019 Salim Mohd. Ansari.

...Petitioner.

Versus

Sayyadali Abduljaffar Choudhary & ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Yousuf Khan, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Shajid Mansuri i/b. Mr. Atique Rehman, advocate for respondent No. 1.

Dr. F.R. Shaikh, APP for State.

Shri Sawant, PSI, RAK Marg, Police Station.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2019.

P.C.:

Petitioner and respondent No. 1 are jointly seeking quashing of FIR under section 384, 504, 506(II) of Indian Penal Code.

The joint request is supported by separate affidavit of respondent No. 1. The petitioner as also respondent No. 1 are present with their advocates and orally accepted the settlement. Learned APP upon instructions from respondent No. 2 states that there are no criminal antecedents. Talwalkar

31.wp477.19.doc In this situation, subject to petitioner and respondent No.1 jointly paying an amount of Rs. 25,000/- as costs to Police Welfare Fund of State of Maharashtra within four weeks, we make rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (A). (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J) Talwalkar