D.A. Stuart India Private Limited v. Prashant Digambar Barhate

45. ao 155.21.doc Urmila Ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date:

2022.09.28 18:14:48 +0530 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 155 OF 2021 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1481 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1619 OF 2021 D.A. Stuart India Private Limited .. Appellant vs.

Prashant Digambar Barhate ..Respondent Ms. Madhavi Doshi i/b Phoenix Legal, for Appellant. Mr. P.S. Rathi i/b Mr. Deeraj J. a/w Mr. Omkar Thombre, Mr. Amit Rathi, Mr. Avinash Pawar, for the Respondent. CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 2022 P.C. :

1.

The parties have tendered the consent terms which are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. The authorised signatory for the appellant Mr. Vijay Barkade is personally present. He says that the consent terms are duly signed by him. Mr. Vijay Barkade is identified by his counsel representing him. The consent terms are also signed by the advocate for the appellant. Likewise, the

45. ao 155.21.doc consent terms are signed by Prashant Digambar Barhate. He is present in the Court. Prashant Digambar Barhate is identified by the advocate for the respondent. The consent terms are duly signed by the advocate for the respondent. The parties agree to abide by the terms of the consent terms.

2.

The appeal from order is disposed of in terms of the consent terms. In view of the disposal of the appeal from order, the interim application also stand disposed of. (M. S. KARNIK, J.)