Deepak Purushottam Gajra v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 7 ABA 363-20.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.363 OF 2020 Deepak Purushottam Gajra .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 908 OF 2020 IN ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 363 OF 2020 Bharat Kantilal Shah .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ...

Mr. Ashutosh Shukla for the applicant.

Mr.A.R. Patil, APP for the State.

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 30th OCTOBER 2021 P.C:- The applicant was admitted to protection from arrest by order dated 11th February 2020. The said order is in force till date. The learned APP, on the basis of instructions from the concerned Investigating Officer who is present in the Court, state that the investigation is complete and they are likely to file the charge-sheet within a period of two weeks.

Tilak

2/2 7 ABA 363-20.doc Investigating Officer makes a specific statement that custody of the applicant is not required since the investigation is over. Recording the said statement, the order dated 11th February 2020 is made absolute.

Application is disposed of.

In view of the disposal of Anticipatory Bail Application, Interim Application does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.

SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J Tilak