The State Of Maharashtra v. Anil Ramchandra Dhuri And ANR

9-ALS-21-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.21 OF 2016 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...APPLICANT V/s.

ANIL RAMCHANDRA DHURI AND ANR.

)...RESPONDENTS Mr.P.H.Gaikwad-Patil, APP for the Applicant - State. Mr.Sachin Punde, Advocate for the Respondents.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :

17th FEBRUARY 2017 P.C. :

Heard.

Prima facie, it is seen that the impugned judgment and order is not only perverse, but absurd. Hence the order : i) Leave granted.

ii) The application for leave to appeal be considered as Memo of Appeal.

iii)Admit.

iv)Issue notice to respondents.

avk 1/2

9-ALS-21-2016.doc v) Learned advocate Mr.Sachin Punde waives notice for both respondents.

vi)Call for Record and Proceedings.

vii)In the meanwhile, action under Section 390 of Code of Criminal Procedure.

viii) Both accused persons to appear before learned trial Magistrate on 22nd March 2017 in terms of action under Section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They should execute P.R.Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- each, apart from furnishing surety in like amount.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) avk 2/2