Mumtaz Ali Shaikh And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

DAE 24-APL-121-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 121 OF 2018 Mumtaz Ali Shaikh And Ors ...Applicants

Versus

The State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Vinod Naik i/by Mr. Vinod Naik Advocate for Applicants. Ms. M. M. Deshmukh APP for Respondent-State.

CORAM : A. S. GADKARI AND PRAKASH D.NAIK, JJ.

DATE : 8th MARCH, 2023.

P.C.:- 1.

Admittedly, after completing investigation in the present crime i.e. C.R. No. 245 of 2017 registered with Pant Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, the Police have submitted charge-sheet.

2.

In view thereof, present Application for quashing FIR does not survive.

3.

Application is accordingly disposed off by granting liberty to the Applicant either to file Application for discharge before the trial Court or to file Application for quashment of charge-sheet by consent as may be permissible under the law.

4.

Application is disposed off in the aforesaid terms. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (A. S. GADKARI, J.) 1/1 by DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE Date: 2023.03.10 11:30:55 +0530 DNYANESHWAR ASHOK ETHAPE