Amit Maruti Jadhav v. The State Of Maharashtra

Trupti 09-ABA-206 & 207-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 206 OF 2017 Mr.Amit Maruti Jadhav ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2017 Mr.Swapnil Madhukar Hegade ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

......

Mr.Abhijit P. Kulkarni for the Applicants in both Anticipatory Bail Applictions.

Mrs. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the Respondent-State. ......

CORAM : MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATE : 27th February 2017 P.C.:

1.

Pursuant to the order dated 2nd February 2017 granting prearrest bail, the applicants-accused have attended the police station. 2.

The learned counsel for the applicants-accused pointed out that the photographs of the prosecutrix and the applicant-accused Amit Jadhav showing that they were interested in each other. He further

Trupti 09-ABA-206 & 207-2017 submits that hereinafter the applicant-accused Amit Jadhav shall not contact the prosecutrix and shall keep away himself. He further submits that the applicants-accused do not have any criminal record. 3.

The learned prosecutor while opposing this application informs the Court that the police have recorded the statements of the witnesses and the police have also read whatsapp and face-book chat, and it appears that they were very friendly with each other. 4.

I have already perused the papers. It appears that this offence of kidnapping has taken place out of love affair. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicants-accused, I confirm the order of pre-arest bail, which was earlier granted by the order dated 2nd February 2017 with the same terms and conditions, except that the applicants-accused shall attend the concerned police station as and when called, till the filing of the charge-sheet. 5.

Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of accordingly. (MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)