Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani v. Mr.Suryakant Jagdale And ORS.

901-wp-509-902-1766-903-1865-909-1424-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.509 OF 2015 Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani ..Petitioner V/s.

Suryakant Jagdale & Ors.

.. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.929 OF 2015 Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani ..Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1567 OF 2015 Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani ..Petitioner V/s.

Shyam Sunder Shinde & Ors.

.. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.4740 OF 2014 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.211 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.4740 OF 2014 Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani ..Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

.. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1766 OF 2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1865 OF 2015 Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani ..Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

.. Respondents N.S. Kamble page 1 of 2

901-wp-509-902-1766-903-1865-909-1424-2015 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1424 OF 2015 Dilip Jamnadas Giyanani ..Petitioner V/s.

The 73RD Metropolitan Magistrate & Ors.

.. Respondents ---- Mr.Charanjeet Chanderpal a/w Mr.M.M.Borkar for the Petitioner.

Mr.V.R.Sutaria for Respondent No.2.

Mr.R.R. Shaikh, APP for the State.

---- CORAM : RANJIT MORE & K. R. SHRIRAM, JJ.

DATE : 28th JANUARY 2016.

P.C.

1.

The counsel for the petitioner stated that the dispute between the parties is settled, in the light of the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Criminal Appeal No.1166/2015. He placed on record the said decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court and in particular invited out attention to paragraph no. 44 of the judgment which supports petitioner's statement. The counsel for the respondent Dilip J. Giyanani does not dispute this position. The counsel for the petitioner accordingly seek leave to withdraw the petitions. Leave is granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. (K. R. SHRIRAM, J) (RANJIT MORE, J.) N.S. Kamble page 2 of 2