Sitaram Motiram Gode v. Ajay Umashankar Agnihotri And ANR

3-ALP-38-2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.38 OF 2016 SHRI SITARAM MOTIRAM GODE )...APPLICANT V/s.

AJAY UMASHANKAR AGNIHOTRI & ANR.

)...RESPONDENTS Mr.Nitin Rajguru, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Ms.A.A.Takalkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :

14th MARCH 2017.

P.C. :

On the last day of hearing, the application was heard. It was adjourned for exploring the possibility of settlement. It appears that as yet, no settlement has been arrived. Perused the impugned judgment and order of acquittal of the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, by the learned JMFC, Kalyan. avk 1/2

3-ALP-38-2016.doc Leave granted.

Admit.

The application for leave to be considered as Memo of Appeal.

Mr.R.D.Suryawanshi, learned advocate for respondent no.1, waives notice for respondent no.1.

The learned APP waives notice for respondent - State. Call for Record and Proceedings.

In the meanwhile, action under Section 390 of the Cr.P.C. before the trial court.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) avk 2/2