← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/567/2022disposed off

Dnyandeo @ Dnyaneshwar Sadashiv Shinde v. Hidyat (Hidayatulla ) Ainuddin Hongod (Hangad)(Deceased) Thr. L.R.S. 1a) Yasmin H. A. Hangad

2022-02-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandeep Kashinath Shinde2 pages

(8-i)-IA-567-2022 in FA-2338-2005.doc 09.02.2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Date:

2022.02.09 17:58:18 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MOHAMMAD NAJEEB MOHAMMAD QAYYUM Interim Application No. 567 / 2022 in First Appeal No. 2338 / 2005 Dnyandeo @ Dnyaneshwar Sadashiv Shinde ... Applicant

Versus

Hidyat (Hidayatulla) Ainuddin Hongod (Hangad) (Deceased) Thr. L.R.S. 1A- Yasmin H. A. Hangad ... Respondent **** Mr. Tejpal S. Ingale a/w Mr. Ritesh Wagh, Advocate for the Applicant.

Smt. Urmila K. Sanil, Advocate for Respondent No.2. **** CORAM : SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.

DATE : 9 th FEBRUARY, 2022.

[Through Video Conference] P.C.

1.

Pending appeal, the Respondent No.1 expired on 27 th July, 2021. This application seeks to bring the legal representatives of the deceased - Respondent No.1.

2.

Heard. Mr. Ingale, learned Counsel for the Applicant and learned Counsel for the Insurance Company.

Najeeb 1/2

(8-i)-IA-567-2022 in FA-2338-2005.doc 09.02.2022 3.

For the reason stated in the application, the delay of 105 days occurred in preferring this application is condoned. The application is allowed in prayer clause (a).

4.

Consequential amendment to be carried out within two weeks from today. After amendment, Registry shall issue notice to the Respondent No.1 (A), (B) and (C) returnable on 27 th April, 2022.

5.

Interim application is allowed and disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.) Najeeb 2/2