Meru Tower-A Co-Operative Housing Society Limited v. Meru Tower-B Co-Operative Housing Society Limited

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. (ST) NO. 7971 OF 2022 IN F.A. NO. 753 OF 2018 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 8534 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 16917 OF 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 8754 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 8757 FO 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 8789 OF 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 12329 OF 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 13486 OF 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 13489 OF 2022 WITH I.A. NO. 16633 OF 2022 IN F.A. NO. 452 OF 2016 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 19139 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 19670 OF 2022 IN F.A. NO. 148 OF 2021 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 19676 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 19678 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 19677 OF 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 20367 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 20368 OF 2022 WITH F.A. (ST) NO. 20544 OF 2022 WITH I.A. (ST) NO. 20546 OF 2022 ..2/-

- 2 - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearance, Court's orders or directions and Court's or Judge's order Registrar's orders CORAM : H.M. BHOSALE REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) Date : 30/11/2022 Adv. Pawant Tiwari i/b Adv. H. R. Pawar for Appellant in I.A. St. No. 7971 of 2022 in F.A. No. 753 of 2018 Adv. Pramila Prajapti i/b Adv. Omprakash Pandey for Appellant in F.A. St. No. 8534 of 2022 with I.A. St. No. 16917 of 2022 Adv. Urmila Palekar i/b Adv. Dushyant Pagare for Appellant in F.A. St. No. 8789 of 2022 Adv. Saurabh Desai i/b Apoorv Vijay Singh Adv. for Appellant in F.A. St. No. 12329 of 2022 Adv. Aniket Malu i/b Akshay Petkar Adv. for Appellant in I.A. No. 16633 of 2022 in F.A. No. 452 of 2016 None present in rest of the matters.

The above numbered Interim Application (St.) / First Appeal (ST) are listed on the board of Registrar third time. Already four weeks time has been granted, however, despite granting four weeks time, the office objections are not removed.

Here reference to Chapter V of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960 ..3/-

- 3 - [For short "Rules"] may be conveniently made. It states about Procedure after presentation, Removal of office objections etc.

In view of provisions under Rule 3 (ii), the Advocates / Parties are expected to remove the office objections within 14 days from the date of notification.

Rule (5) further provides that, if the office objections are not removed as provided under Rule 3, the office shall place the matter before the Registrar, who shall refuse the registration of all such matters.

The prescribed time to remove the office objections provided under Rules 1960 has been expired long back. Thereafter also 04 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to non removal of office objections. However, instead of passing order of refusal of registration or dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one opportunity to remove the office objections.

In turn, two weeks time is granted with directions to remove the office objections without fail. On failure, registration would stand refused / First Appeal would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court of Registrar. No further extension will be granted.

sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II)