Rajendra Shivaji Babar v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 19.236.16 ba

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 236 OF 2016 Rajendra Shiavji Babar .....Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra ....Respondent Mr. P. G. Sarda Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Prashant Jadhav APP for the State.

Mr. Rajendra Sanap, P.S.I. Karveer Police Station, Kolhapur.

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : SEPTEMBER 1, 2016.

PC :

1) Heard. Applicant herein impugns the order dated 29/12/2015 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Pune. Applicant was arrested on 17/02/2011 for offence punishable under section 392, 450, 458, 472, 467 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code and under section 25 (1) (3) of Arms Act and under section 3 (1) (ii), 4 of M.C.O.C. Act. He was enlarged on bail under section 167 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Thereafter, he had not attended the court on several dates and therefore, a non-bailable warrant was issued against him. He was re-arrested on 28/09/2015 and was remanded to Judicial custody on ism

2 19.236.16 ba 30/09/2015. It is a matter of record that Applicant had not caused his appearance before the Special Court for a long time. 2) The learned APP has filed an affidavit and it is demonstrated that Applicant has criminal antecedents of similar crimes registered against him for offence punishable under sections 454, 457, 380, 379 of the Indian Penal Code of different police stations. That Applicant runs an organization and therefore, is being prosecuted under the provisions of MCOC Act. It is in these circumstances that Applicant does not deserve to be enlarged on bail. The learned Sessions Judge make an endeavour to conclude the recording of evidence within one year from the date of framing of charge. 3) Application stands dismissed.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism