Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. Thr. Its Authorized Officer v. Mr. Prakash Hari Bendkule And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1543 OF 2019 IN FIRST APPEAL No. 473 OF 2019 Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. through Its Authorized Officer ...Applicant Vs.

Mr. Prakash Hari Bendkule and Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Sarthak S. Diwan for the Applicant

CORAM:

K.K. TATED, J.

DATE :

MAY 2, 2019 P.C. :

1.

Not on Board. At the request of learned counsel for the Applicant, matter is taken on board.

2.

Heard learned counsel Mr. Sarthak Diwan for the Applicant 3.

By this Civil Application, the Applicant Insurance Company is seeking stay of the operation and implementation of the Judgment and Award dated 21st September, 2018 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Nashik in MACP No. 55 of 2015 holding that Respondents /Claimants are entitled sum of Rs. 9,66,000/- by way of compensation along with interest at the rate of 7% p.a. 4.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that if the entire compensation is recovered by the Respondents/Claimants by filing execution application, then nothing will survive in the present 1/3

proceedings. He submits that they have good chance of success in the matter. He further submits that pending the hearing and final disposal of the First Appeal, the operation and implementation of the Impugned Judgment and Award may be stayed. He submits that if the stay is not granted, irreparable loss would be caused to the Applicant. 5.

Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that, Applicant is ready and willing to deposit the entire awarded amount along with interest on or before 21st June, 2019 in the Tribunal. Statement is accepted.

6.

In the present proceedings, the accident occurred on 19th December, 2014. The Respondents/Claimants lost their son Samadhan Prakash Bendkule, who was unmarried and aged about 20 years and at that time he was earning Rs.6,000/- p.m. from his work as Labourer. On the basis of this fact, the Respondents/Claimants filed claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, claiming the compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-. The Tribunal after considering the evidence on record, held that the Respondents/Claimants are entitled to get a sum of Rs.9,66,000/- 7.

Considering this fact, I am of the opinion that the Respondents /Claimants required to be permitted to withdraw some amount without furnishing any security during the pendency of the First Appeal, but subject to outcome of the First Appeal. 5.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicants and perusing the impugned judgment and award dated 21 st September, 2018, I am satisfied that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing this Civil Application. Hence, following order: 2/3

ORDER

(A) Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) on condition that the Applicant to deposit entire awarded amount along with interest accrued thereon, in the Tribunal at Nashik on or before 21st June, 2019, failing which the civil application shall stand dismissed without referring back to the Court. Prayer clause (b) reads thus:

"b) That pending hearing and final disposal of the present First Appeal, the effect, operation, implementation and execution of the impugned Judgment and Award dated 21.09.2018 passed by the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal at Nashik in M.A.C.P. No.55 of 2015 and disbursal of amount there under, be kindly stayed." (B) If amount deposited within time as stated hereinabove, Prakash Hari Bendkule Claimant No.1 and Vimal Prakash Bendkule Claimant No.2 are entitled to withdraw some of Rs.1,50,000/- each with accrued interest thereon without furnishing any security, but subject to outcome of the First Appeal. (C) The Tribunal is directed to invest the remaining balance amount in the fixed deposit of any nationalized bank initially, for a period of one year and same to be continued till further orders. (D) Liberty granted to the Claimants to make appropriate Application for withdrawal of further amount and that Application be decided on its own merits.

Civil application stands disposed off accordingly. (K. K. TATED, J.) 3/3