Vikram Chandrapal Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra

BA 376-19.doc Anand IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 376 OF 2019 Vikram Chandrapal Yadav .Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr. Vijendra Kumar Rai, Advocate, for the Applicant Ms Veera Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State

CORAM

:

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE :

16.07.2019 P.C.

.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By this Application, the Applicant seeks his enlargement on bail in connection with C. R. No. 183 of 2017 registered with the Malad Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 326A, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Perused the papers. According to the Complainant - Chandansingh Shyamsingh, the incident took place on 08.05.2017. It is alleged by the Complainant that the Applicant who was working as Tile Supervisor and Cleaner at the construction site, started fighting with the Complainant and others, under the influence of Alcohol and questioned

BA 376-19.doc them that as to why they were asking him to leave the premises. According to the Complainant, he tried to explain to the Applicant that the working time was over and the doors have to be closed. It is alleged that the Applicant threatened the Complainant by asking "whether he was Dada" and that if he would remove him, he will have to face the consequences. It is further alleged by the Complainant that after some time, the Applicant came to the spot and threw tile cleaning acid on the Complainant's face, when the Complainant was sleeping, resulting in the Complainant sustaining grievous injuries to his eyes, as the acid spread in his eyes.

4.

Considering the material on record qua the Applicant, this is not a fit case to enlarge the Applicant on bail. Hence, the Application is rejected. However, having regard to the peculiar facts, the trial of the Applicant is expedited.

5.

It is made clear that the observations made herein are prima facie, and the trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.

(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)