← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2246/2016allowed

Shri Mohammad Zubair Mohammad Sofi v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And ORS

2016-03-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi2 pages

vks wp 3797of 2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.10583 OF 2015 Prashant Sitaram Shinge ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.11823 OF 2015 Mrs. Megha Prajakt Mahimkar ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1668 OF 2016 Shri Vinay Kumar Singh and ors .Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr ..Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.1707 OF 2016 Shri Usmani Qazi Faridul Haq .Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2246 OF 2016 Shri Mohammad Zubair Mohammad .Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents.

WITH WRIT PETITION NO.3797 OF 2016 Ms. Monica Amarlal Sangtani .Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr .. Respondents.

vks wp 3797of 2016.doc Mr. N. V. Bandiwadekar, a/w Mr. Sagar Mane and Mr. M.G. Bagkar, for Petitioners.

Mrs.M. P. Thakur, AGP for the Respondent State. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI, JJ.

DATE : 31st MARCH, 2016.

P. C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Bandiwadekar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. M. P. Thakur, learned AGP for the State.. The issue involved in all these petitions is similar to the issue involved in Writ Petition No.2207 of 2016. We have disposed of today the said Writ Petition by passing a detailed speaking order. 3.

In that view of the matter, all these petitions are allowed. The impugned orders in all these petitions are quashed and set aside; Respondent No.2 in these petitions is directed to consider afresh the proposal submitted by respondent institution, for approval to the appointment of petitioners. Respondent No.2 shall take decision as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 4.

All concerned shall act on the authenticated copy of this order.

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR JOSHI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.]