Aradhana Chand v. Gautam Krishan Chand

22-AO172-2023.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 172 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2196 OF 2023 SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2023.04.27 19:10:18 +0530 Aradhana Chand ...Appellant

Versus

Gautam Krishan Chand

...Respondent

Mr. Vikramaditya Deshmukh, a/w Manan Jaiswal, i/b Akshay Vani, for the Appellant.

Mr. Gautam Chand, Respondent-in-person.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED :

26th APRIL, 2023 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned Counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant, in view of the contentions in paragraph 42 of the written statement of the defendant, does not wish to prosecute the appeal.

3.

The appeal stands disposed.

4.

In view of disposal of the appeal, interim application does not survive and also stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 1/1