← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1361/2023disposed off

Umesh Sawant And ORS v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

2023-10-23Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre2 pages

1/2 9 WP-1361-23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

MANDIRA MILIND SALGAONKAR MANDIRA MILIND SALGAONKAR Date: 2023.10.26 10:50:28 +0530 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1361 OF 2023 Umesh Sawant & Ors.

..

Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..

Respondents ...

Ms.Vidhya Iyengar with Ms.Shrutika Mestri for the Petitioners.

Ms.Rimpal Trivedi with Ms.Harshida Bhanusali for the Respondent No.2.

Mr.S.R.Agarkar, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent No.1. ...

CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 23rd OCTOBER, 2023 P.C:- 1.

The present Petition is fled, being aggrieved by issuance of notice by the Metropolitan Magistrate, on an application fled by the wife under Sections 12, 1,, 1,, 1,, 20, 22 and 2322t of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking several reliefs.

I have perused the application, supported by affdavit, particularly stating that whatever stated in the application is true and correct and she is reiterating and confrming each and every statement and averment made in the application. It is also specifcally pleaded that if the reliefs as prayed for, are M.M.Salgaonkar

2/2 9 WP-1361-23.odt not granted, she would suffer irreparable loss, harm, damage, injury and great hardship.

2.

The learned counsel for the Petitioners, who have assailed the cognizance of the said application by issuing notice, would assertively submit that the application is nothing but an after thought, after the divorce proceedings are fled by the husband. She has also advanced her submissions pointing out the falsity of the accusations, but I do not think that it is possible for me to assess the truthfulness of the averments, as it is always open for the Respondents in the application to traverse the said pleadings, by fling an appropriate reply and by rendering appropriate evidence before the competent court and in this case, the Metropolitan Magistrate. In the wake of the above, I do not think that mere issuance of notice is a ground for me to invoke and exercise the inherent powers of this Court, particularly when the veracity and truthfulness of the statement in the application, is the matter which would fall within the province of the concerned Magistrate.

In the wake of the above, the Writ Petition cannot be entertained and is dismissed.

2 SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.t M.M.Salgaonkar