Vadivel @ Gundappa Chinnatambi Devendra v. The State Of Maharashtra

16-APPA-196-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.196 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.908 OF 2014 VADIVEL @ GUNDAPPA CHINNATAMBI ) DEVENDRA )...APPLICANT V/s.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA )...RESPONDENT Mr.V.V.Purwant, Advocate for the Applicant.

Ms.V.S.Mhaispurkar, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

A. M. BADAR, J.

DATE :

15th FEBRUARY 2017.

P.C. :

This is second bail application of the applicant / appellant. His first bail application came to be rejected by this court on 29th January 2015 by holding that the applicant does not deserve to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the appeal, as the act of the applicant is that of a person with pervert mind. avk 1/2

16-APPA-196-2017.doc In the light of these observations of the court, it cannot be said that the applicant has good case on merit for getting him enlarged on bail. Similarly, detention behind the bar for four years does not ipso facto make the applicant entitle for bail. In this view of the matter, the following order : i) The application is rejected.

ii) Hearing of the appeal is expedited.

iii)The appeal be listed for Final Hearing as per its turn in the category of jail appeals.

(A. M. BADAR, J.) avk 2/2