← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/670/2021disposed off

Chandraneel Pandurang Ramji v. State Of Maharashtra Thr. Secretary Tribal Development Dept. And ORS

2022-02-02Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Virendrasingh Gyansingh Bisht2 pages

9-WP.670.2021+3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 670 OF 2021 Chandraneel Pandurang Ramji } Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 769 OF 2021 Prabhakar Govind Gonji } Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 671 OF 2021 Sudahkar Pandharinath More } Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 672 OF 2021 Ramakant Pandurang Vihurkar } Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. R. K. Mendadkar for the petitioners.

Mr. P. P. Kakade-Government Pleader with Ms. N. M. Mehra-AGP for State.

Ms. Anjali Neel Helekar with Mr. A. R. Gole and Ms. Anu C. Kaladharan for respondent no. 2.

Mr. V. P. Vaidya with Mr. Mahendra Agvekar and Ms. Shraddha Chavan for respondent no. 3.

J.V.Salunke,PS

9-WP.670.2021+3 CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & V. G. BISHT, J.

DATE :

FEBRUARY 2, 2022 P.C.:

1.

After hearing progressed to some length, Mr. Mendadkar, learned advocate for the petitioners in this set of writ petitions seeks leave to withdraw the same. He also seeks liberty to enable the petitioners explore alternative remedies available to them in law.

2.

In view of the aforesaid submission, these writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

3.

This order shall not preclude the petitioners to pursue remedies that are available to them, in accordance with law. 4.

In the event the petitioners approach the alternative forum with appropriate application(s) and limitation is raised as an objection to the maintainability thereof, the said forum will take into account that these writ petitions were pending before this Court from February last year and that the benefit envisaged by section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 could be extended to them.

SALUNKE J V by SALUNKE J V Date: 2022.02.03 11:06:35 +0530 (V. G. BISHT, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) J.V.Salunke,PS