Shivaji Digambar Hulge v. Dr. Ravi Shriram Bangadkar And ANR.

903.APEALNo.1942015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.194 OF 2015 Mr.Shivaji Digambar Hulge ...

Appellant V/s.

Dr.Ravi Shriram Bangadkar & Anr. ...

Respondents .....

Mr.Deodatta Laxman Lad, Advocate for the Appellant Mr.Deepak Thakre, APP for the Respondent/State. ....

CORAM :

ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.

DATED :

9TH APRIL 2015 P.C.

1.

Heard.

2.

The learned counsel for the appellant submits that during the pendency of the appeal, the parties have settled their dispute amicably and are seeking composition of the offence in question. The Consent Terms signed by the parties are tendered in the court, taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. By questioning the parties, I have satisfied myself that dispute between them has indeed been settled.

3.

As regards the office note/objection, the learned counsel for the appellant undertakes to pay the requisite Court Fee within a week.

Gaikwad RD 1/2

903.APEALNo.1942015 4.

In view of this, leave to compound the offence granted. 5.

Offence compounded.

6.

In view of this, the appeal stands dismissed. 7.

The amount deposited by the respondent No.1 (original accused) in the trial Court be handed over to the appellant i.e. the original complainant in accordance with the terms of compromise.

8.

The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

(ABHAY M. THIPSAY J.) Gaikwad RD 2/2