← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/335/2017others disposed off

Ashika Praful Parkar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2017-02-28Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav2 pages

3.ba335.17.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2017 Ashika Praful Parkar.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 163 OF 2017 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 335 OF 2017 Ponnamma Babu ... Intervenor.

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Ashika Praful Parkar.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Niranjan Mundargi i/b. Ms. Sunita S. Gaonkar, advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Pawan Mali i/b. Mr. Rohansingh Thakur, advocate for intervenor. Ms. P.P. Shinde, APP for State.

Mr. Rahul Pawar, API, Antop Hill Police Station. --- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : FEBRUARY 28, 2017 Talwalkar 1/2

3.ba335.17.sxw P.C.:

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of this application, investigation is completed and chargesheet is filed. In view of the changed circumstances, the learned Counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice with further liberty to approach the appropriate court in changed circumstances. It is made clear that this application has not been heard on merits. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

Intervention application is heard, allowed and disposed of. (SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2