Mohd. Tariq Imtiyaz Shaikh @ Nanhu And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

17-apl-142.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2019 Mohd. Tariq Imtiyaz Shaikh and anr.

... Applicants

Versus

Sr. Police Inspector and anr.

...

Respondents Mr. Mateen A.A. Shaikh for the applicants.

Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the respondent State. Mr.Arshad Shaikh for respondent no. 2.

Mr. D.R. Tone, PSI Kurla Police Station present. CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE :

MARCH 05, 2019 P.C.:

Heard respective counsel. Applicant as also respondent no.2 are present. Similarly minor is also present. They are jointly requesting for quashing of FIR. Parties are neighbours and the manner in which the events transpire show that it was a trivial issue.

In this situation, by warning the applicants and also respondent no. 2 not to indulge in such conduct again, we make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) nilegaonkar 1/1