← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/628/2019others disposed off

Dr. Alankar Khanvilkar v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2019-02-06Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Mridula Bhatkar2 pages

Sherla V.

wp.628.2019_527.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.628 OF 2019 Dr.Alankar Khanvilkar ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents Mr.E.A. Sasi for the Petitioner Mr.A.R. Patil, APP, for the Respondent - State CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATED: FEBRUARY 6, 2019 P.C.:

1.

Upon urgent mentioning, taken on Production Board. 2.

The petitioner in this petition is the original complainant and seeks prosecution of the accused under section 304A on the ground of medical negligence. He has made two applications before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate 66th Mobile Court at Andheri, Mumbai i.e., one for seeking time to engage a special prosecutor in his matter from the Law & Judiciary department and second, for adding two persons as accused in the main proceedings. The learned Magistrate has rejected both the

wp.628.2019_527.doc applications and so he has filed criminal Revision Application No.176 of 2016 before the Sessions Court against the order of the learned Magistrate rejecting the application for adding two persons as accused. It is also prayed that a third application was moved by the original complainant for transfer of the case from 66th Mobile Court at Andheri to any other Court.

3.

Learned Prosecutor submits to the orders of the Court. 4.

In view of the prayers made in the petition, there is no necessity to add the accused as party to this petition and I am of the view that with the following order, the petition can be disposed of:

i) The accused are to be added in the Criminal Revision Application No.176 of 2016.

ii) The learned Sessions Court to expedite the hearing of criminal Revision Application No.176 of 2016, preferably in four months from otday.

5.

Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)