Tushar Mahabal Shah v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 / 2 05-ABA-391-22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.391 OF 2022 Tushar Mahabal Shah .... Applicant versus State of Maharashtra .... Respondent .......

• Mr.Chetan Alai a/w Mr.Atmaram Patade, Advocate for Applicant.

• Ms.Sharmila S. Kaushik, APP for the State/Respondent. • (I.O.) PSI - Mr.Jagadish Bhopale, Charkop Police Station.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 17th FEBRUARY, 2022 P.C. :

1.

At the outset, learned APP makes a statement on instructions that the investigating agency does not want custody of the present Applicant. But he may be directed to attend the concerned police station on particular dates. 2.

Considering this statement, the application can be Digitally signed by MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR Date:

2022.02.18 17:47:35 +0530 MANUSHREE V NESARIKAR allowed without going into the merits of the matter, since the investigating agency does not want to arrest the Applicant. Nesarikar

2 / 2 05-ABA-391-22.odt 3.

Hence, the following order :

O R D E R

(i) In the event of his arrest in connection with M.E.C.R. No.01 of 2016, dated 29/09/2016, registered with Charkop Police Station, Mumbai, the Applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing PR bond in the sum of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with one or two sureties in the like amount.

(ii) The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station on 01/03/2022, 02/03/2022 and 03/03/2022 between 01.00 to 04.00 p.m. and shall cooperate with the investigation.

(iii) In addition, the Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when called and shall cooperate with the investigation.

(iv) Application stands disposed of accordingly. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)