Yogesh Pralhad Jamkar And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 221 OF 2015 Yogesh Pralhad Jamkar & Ors.
...Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra
...Respondent
Mr. Prashant Mohan Patil for the Applicant Ms. A. T. Javeri, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
THURSDAY, 26TH MARCH, 2015 P.C. :
1.
Heard learned Counsel for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. 2.
By this application, the applicants seek pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. 397/2014 registered with the Samata Nagar Police Station, Mumbai, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 506(ii) r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.
The learned Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have settled the matter with the complainant-Shivrani @ Vaishnavi Yogesh Jamkar, amicably and have entered into a "Kararnama" 1/3
to that effect on 4th March, 2015. He tenders a copy of the said Kararnama. The same is taken on record and marked `X' for identification. The said Kararnama is signed by the applicant No. 1 and the complainant. 4.
The complainant-Shivrani @ Vaishnavi Yogesh Jamkar is present in Court with her father. She accepts signing the said Kararnama. Learned A.P.P also has verified the same.
5.
Considering the fact that the allegations are under Sections 498-A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and that the parties have entered into a Kararnama, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest, on the following terms and conditions :
ORDER
(i) In the event of the arrest, the applicant be enlarged on bail on furnishing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount ; 6.
The Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms and is accordingly disposed of.
2/3
7.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of this application.
8.
Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
3/3