Raju Sitaram Jadhav v. Bhau Sitaram Jadhav

Mamta Kale 35-sa-968-2006.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2006 Baba Gopala Jadhav and Ors.

..Appellants Vs.

Bhau Sitaram Jadhav and Ors.

..Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1805 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2006 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7814 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2006 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2006 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1808 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2006 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7820 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2006 ---- Digitally signed by MAMTA AMAR KALE Date:

2024.04.25 19:27:33 +0530 MAMTA AMAR KALE Mr. Akash Pandey i/b. Shekhar Jagtap, for the Applicant in IA/1805/2024 & IA/1808/2024.

Mr. Gaurav Ugale i/b. S. P. Hushing, for the Respondent in both appeals.

---- CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J.

DATE : 25 APRIL 2024

Mamta Kale 35-sa-968-2006.doc P.C.

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1805 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2006 .

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This is an application for early hearing of the Second Appeal No.968/2006.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that the appeal is pending since the year 2006, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

4.

Interim application stands disposed of accordingly. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1808 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 970 OF 2006 .

Heard.

2.

Leave to amend. Amendment to be carried out within a week from today.

3.

This is an application for early hearing of the Second Appeal No.970/2006.

4.

For the reasons stated in the application and the fact that the appeal is pending since the year 2006, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B).

5.

Interim application stands disposed of accordingly. R. N. LADDHA, J.