Raju Laxman Pacchapure v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 wp 626 & 627.16.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NOS.626 & 627 OF 2016 Raju Laxman Pacchapure ....Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and anr.

....Respondents Mr. Kedar J. Patil, advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Sangeeta D. Shinde, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE : 18th SEPTEMBER, 2018.

P. C. :

Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to file discharge application before the Trial Court. Leave with liberty as prayed for, is granted. The writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

2.

It is made clear that we have not gone into the merits of the matter and, all rights and contentions of the respective parties are kept expressly open. In the event, discharge application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be decided independently on its own merits. [SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1 Shubhada Shankar Kadam Shubhada Shankar Kadam Date: 2018.09.21 12:33:58 +0530