Shri. Sunil Sadashiv Dhanawade v. The Divisional Traffic Officer

p3.1821.17-wp FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1821/2017 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Manoj A. Patil for the petitioner Ms. Kavita Anchan i/b. M. V. Kini & Co. for the respondent CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 10, 2017 P.C.:

1.

Not on board. At the request of Advocate for the petitioner, matter is taken on board for urgent orders.

2.

By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner challenges the order dated 11.1.2017 passed by Industrial Court No.1, Kolhapur in Revision Application (ULP) No.3 of 2017.

3.

By that order, Industrial Court directed petitioner to submit his explanation to the final show cause notice, if he desires. This itself shows that the final order is not passed on final show cause notice.

Basavraj G Patil 1/2

p3.1821.17-wp 4.

The learned counsel for the respondent rightly raised objection that the petitioner has filed present petition which is premature.

5.

Considering the impugned order dated 11.1.2017 by which the court directed petitioner to submit his explanation to the final show cause notice, I do not find any reason to entertain the present Writ Petition at present. Petition itself is premature. Hence, same stands rejected.

6.

As per the request of the petitioner, one week time is extended to submit his explanation as per the impugned order to the authority.

JUDGE Basavraj G Patil 2/2