Nutan Anil Kumar Joshi v. Smt. Sulochana Wd/O Raghunath Vinayak Mahashabde And ORS.

ssm 1 46-cac360.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 360 OF 2015 IN CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 371 OF 2007 Nutan Anil Kumar Joshi .....Applicant.

Vs.

Smt. Sulochana Wd/O Raghunath Vinayak Mahashabde & Ors.

.....Respondents.

Mr. Uday Warunjikar i/by Jasmin Shah for the Applicant. CORAM : A. S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 3rd FEBRUARY, 2020.

P.C.:- Heard learned counsel for the Applicant.

The note put up by the Registry mentions that, the name of the Respondent No.1 is deleted from the array of the Respondents as per Order dated 3rd September, 2015, as he has expired. It is further mentioned that, the other Respondents are duly served in the matter. This is an Application for bringing LRs of Respondent No.2 on record and to implead Respondent No. 10 i.e. M/s. Richa India Infra Development Private Limited as a necessary party. Mr. Warunjikar, learned counsel for the Applicant submitted that, after admission of the present Revision, the suit property has been 1/2

ssm 2 46-cac360.15.doc taken over by the Respondent No.10 M/s. Richa India Infra Development Private Limited.

It is further submitted that, the present Application is filed within the period of limitation.

In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the Application, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Necessary amendment be carried out within a period of four weeks from today.

(A.S. GADKARI, J.) by Sanjiv S.

Mashalkar Date:

2020.02.07 11:56:46 +0530 Sanjiv S.

Mashalkar 2/2