John Augustine Gomes v. David Augustine Pereira And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.98 OF 2015 JOHN AUGUSTINE GOMES )...APPLICANT V/s.

DAVID AUGUSTINE PEREIRA AND ANR.

)...RESPONDENTS Shri Sanjay Bhatia, Advocate for the Applicant. None for Respondent No.1.

Shri A.R.Patil, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.

DATE :

4th JANUARY 2016.

P.C. :

None present for respondent no.1, despite service. Heard Shri Sanjay Bhatia, the learned counsel for the applicant. I have gone through the averments made in the application.

avk 1/3

Respondent no.1 has not chosen to remain present and oppose the application for condonation of delay. Under the circumstances, considering the averments in paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of the application, and upon hearing the learned counsel for the applicant, I am inclined to condone the delay.

The application is allowed.

Delay condoned.

The application for leave to appeal be numbered and be placed on board for Admission on 11th January 2016. (ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) avk 2/3

CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment / Order.

avk 3/3