Shri. Raosaheb Jingonda Patil v. Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurvedic Mahavidyala, Solapur And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1158 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5768 OF 2012 Raosaheb Jingonda Patil Applicant/ Org.Respondent no.1 In the matter between :

Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya and another Petitioners versus Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and others Respondents Mr.Manoj Patil for Applicant.

Mr.Neal Helekar for Petitioners.

Ms.Rupali M. Shinde, AGP, for Respondents 3 and 4. Mr.R.V.Govilkar for Respondent no.2.

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE :

23rd November 2016 PC :

Heard learned counsel on civil application. We do not find any reason to pass any order on this civil application at this stage. The writ petition has already been admitted. Writ Petition No.5768 of 2012 be listed for final hearing in February-2017. Civil Application No.1158 of 2014 stands disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) MST

1/2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1157 OF 2014 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5768 OF 2012 Raosaheb Jingonda Patil Applicant/ Org.Respondent no.1 In the matter between :

Seth Govindji Raoji Ayurvedic Mahavidyalaya and another Petitioners versus Maharashtra University of Health Sciences and others Respondents Mr.Manoj Patil for Applicant.

Mr.Neal Helekar for Petitioners.

Ms.Rupali M. Shinde, AGP, for Respondents 3 and 4. Mr.R.V.Govilkar for Respondent no.2.

CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE :

23rd November 2016 PC :

Heard. It has been stated by learned counsel for writ Petitioners that the amount of back wages deposited by them, may be allowed to be withdrawn by Applicant herein, subject to furnishing a written undertaking to the Petitioner to the effect that in case the writ petition is allowed, the Applicant herein shall re-deposit the amount, as may be withdrawn.

2/2 2.

In view of this, the civil application is disposed of with liberty to the Applicant herein to withdraw the amount deposited by writ Petitioners, subject to furnishing a written undertaking to the Petitioners that if ultimately writ petition is allowed, he will redeposit the amount as may be withdrawn. (PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) MST