← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/700/2024allowed

Vishnu Bhaskar Mantri v. The Central Bureau Of Investigation And ANR.

2024-02-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik4 pages

2024:BHC-AS:8566

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2024 VISHNU BHASKAR MANTRI ..APPELLANT VS.

THE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ANR.

..RESPONDENTS ------------ Adv. Sarthak P. Shetty for the Appellant.

Adv. Shriram Shirsat, SPP a/w Adv. Nishad Mokashi a/w Adv. Tanvi Mate a/w Adv. Karishma Rajesh for Respondent No.1 - CBI Ms. Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the State.

------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 22, 2024 P.C. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 158 OF 2024 1.

Admit.

2.

Call for record and proceedings.

3.

SPP Shri Shirsat waives service on behalf of Respondent No.1 - CBI and Ms. Bajoria waives service on behalf of Respondent No.2 - State.

1/4

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 700 OF 2024 4.

This is an application for suspension of sentence and for bail.

5.

The present applicant is convicted under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine. The applicant is also convicted under Section 420 read with Section 120-B of the IPC and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine. The applicant is further convicted under Section 13(2) read with Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ("P.C. Act" for short), and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine. The fine amount has been paid. The substantive sentences of imprisonment are ordered to be run concurrently. 6.

The present application is opposed by Shri Shirsat, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 - CBI. It is submitted that after appreciating the evidence and materials on record the trial Court has convicted the appellant for a serious offence under the P.C. Act. It is 2/4

prayed that the application be rejected.

7.

The applicant was on bail during the trial. There is nothing on record to indicate that the applicant has misused his liberty while on bail. Considering the short sentence imposed and as the appeal is unlikely to be heard any time soon, I am inclined to suspend the sentence and enlarge the applicant on bail.

8.

The sentence is accordingly suspended.

9.

The applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing P.R. Bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount.

10.

The applicant shall report to the trial Court once a year, on the first Monday of the concerned month, between 11.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. commencing March 2024. 11.

As it is the contention of the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is bedridden, it is always open for the applicant to make an appropriate request to the trial Court for reporting through video conferencing facility. 12.

The applicant shall surrender his passport to respondent No.1-CBI till further orders.

3/4

13.

The interim application stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 4/4 Signed by: Darshan Patil Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/02/2024 18:29:47