Neelam Yuvraj Vani v. President Industrial Court And ANR.

by ANANT KRISHNA NAIK Date:

2024.04.01 10:55:15 +0530 ANANT KRISHNA NAIK 6.WP.1940.2016 .doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1940 OF 2016 Neelam Yuvraj Vani .. Petitioner versus President, Industrial Court and Ors.

.. Respondents Adv. Gayatri Singh, Senior Advocate a/w. Adv. Nawaz Dordi, Adv. Vishal Jadhav for the petitioner.

Ms. T. J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State. Neelam Vani, Petitioner present in-person.

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. M. SATHAYE, JJ.

DATED : 26 MARCH, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner states that the written instructions are received from the Petitioner not to press the Petition. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner is present in the Court. Learned Counsel further states that the Petitioner has taken a conscious decision not to press the matter to put quietus to the entire episode.

2.

In the light thereof, without going into any other aspect, the Writ Petition is disposed of as not pressed.

(M. M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) akn 1/1