Shashikatn Sitaram Naik v. Prakash Dinkar Naik

03-CA-1327-2019.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1327 OF 2019 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR IN SECOND APPEAL (ST) NO.4078 OF 2019 ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2023.02.06 19:29:39 +0530 Shashikant Sitaram Naik ...Applicants V/s.

Prakash Dinkar Naik & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Rahul M. More, for the Applicants.

Mr. Suresh M. Kamble, for the Respondents.

CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATE : 6th FEBRUARY, 2023 P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Rahul M. More, learned counsel appearing for the Applicants and Mr. Suresh M. Kamble, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.

2.

There is delay of about 35 days in filing the Second Appeal. Learned counsel appearing for the Respondents strongly opposes the Interim Application. For the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

3.

The Interim Application is disposed of in above terms

03-CA-1327-2019.doc with no order as to costs.

(MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.)