Bajaj Electricals Limited Through Their Power Of Attorny Holder Pandurang S. More v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1/2 Yadav 10.wp.643.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 643 OF 2018 Bajaj Electricals Limited ...

Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents Mr. Ruchir Dholkia a/w Jaymala Raut for Petitioner. Mr. H. J. Dedhiya, APP for Respondent No.1 - State. CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE :

APRIL 24, 2018.

P.C. :

.

The learned Counsel for Petitioner, upon instructions, makes a motion for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to move appropriate application before the learned Magistrate. 2.

The Writ Petition is disposed off, as withdrawn with liberty as prayer for.

3.

It is clarified that the Court has not examined the issue raised. 4.

Having regard to the nature of examination-in-chief filed by

2/2 Yadav 10.wp.643.18 the Accused in his defence, it will be appropriate to observe that while dealing with the said examination-in-chief and cross-examination, the court of learned Magistrate shall be sensitive to the issue of law laid down by the Apex Court in the matter of Indian Bank Association and others V/s Union of India and others [Writ Petition No. 18 of 2013]. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)