Ranjeet Kumar Narad Mahto v. The State Of Maharashtra

Urmila Ingale

35. ba 607.22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.607 OF 2022 Ranjeet Kumar Narad Mahto ..Applicant VS.

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

..Respondents by URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Date: 2023.02.02 19:11:43 +0530 URMILA PRAMOD INGALE Mr. Datta Mane, for Applicant.

Mr. Nikhil Wadikar a/w Ms. Faiza Shaikh, Mr. Pradeep Zende, Mr. Malhar Pawar i/b Nandu Pawar, for respondent no. 2. Ms. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.

PSI-Chaitali Jadhav,Bhiwandi City Police Station present CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 2, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Since the complainant is represented through private advocate, Advocate Vilasini Balasubramaniam who was appointed by me to represent the complainant, stands discharged. I appreciate the assistance rendered by her. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application.

3.

The bail application is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application after 6 months if the trial does not proceed substantially.

4.

The bail application is disposed as withdrawn. (M. S. KARNIK, J.) 1/1